Mark collard lottery software

Will continue to use! Thanks Texas. I must say that this system is absolutely top. I can't wait till next Saturday to see how much I win. This pile of hype is just the same old useless past results analysis software yet again.

Neither of which makes any difference to your chances of winning. Same old nonsense but at least the story gets funnier each time they release a new product site. This time Astrology and signs of the zodiac are the big secret. If you give out enough different combinations to enough people, somebody will win. This one clearly models itself on the Lottery Black Book.

It has the ridiculous story — a convenience store owner threatening a customer with a gun because he claims too many lottery prizes. The most ridiculous of which is the photo of Urooj Khan who died in — before this was even created. Then there are the supposed photos of Everett himself — only he seems to have photoshopped the name on the winners check, oh, and a different head onto John McCarthy from Delaware. Yes, there is the possibility of bias existing in a draw.

No, nobody has ever been able to prove it exists. All the classic warning signs are there — including the complaints about trying to get a refund. Based on grouping combinations into patterns, then saying you have more chance if you match the pattern. Making it entirely pointless.

And all you have to do is plug the last 7 results into the magic formula? The ludicrous story alone should be enough to make you walk away. But if not, then how about the fake photos of people who did NOT win the lottery using this system? Enough said? This makes the same mistake I see over and over again.

He seems to think that if you match patterns that occur more often in all the possible combinations of results, then you are more likely to win a theory which Gail Howard sadly made famous. But just matching a pattern is useless — no lottery pays you for matching a pattern, only for matching the actual numbers drawn. WB Co. Iowa then fined them in December for sending fraudulent mailings. Then he goes on to explain this approach is based on eliminating the millions of combinations that will never win, which demonstrates a lack of understanding of even basic probability.

There are much better, more honest syndicates to choose from, so please avoid this one. No lottery system has ever been banned by any lottery company anywhere, ever! If wheeling systems are really what you want then go to a genuine recognised expert for this Bluskov. What systems do you like that are effective or do you recommend for a lottery system that makes sense? He does have a Ph. D which could mean Piled Higher and Deeper? Any comment on this one?

How about Richard Lustig? More about Richard Lustig here. More about playing the same numbers here. More in a long chain of Hamilton Publishing lottery dross. Hey Lottery Guy… howdy and Happy Professor T Lottery System. I just received the latest copy in Jan. Personally I think it has a lot of useful features like generating all combinations from a set of numbers and then reducing those combinations so you still have a chance to win a prize including top prize without having to spend so much — much like wheeling systems do.

Having defended Lotwin I still have to say that Expert Lotto does almost everything that Lotwin does and does those things better AND costs a lot less. The program also has a feature that lets you check your lottery results with just one mouse click. With Winlottosystems Premium Software, you will see how easy it is to target winning numbers and win often!

Sat, 24 Aug Post a Comment. Labels: article , deciding on , win lotto. No comments:.